|
Incarcerated
teenage girls are regularly shackled with handcuffs and leg
restraints even when they are in prison for minor offences.
Legally,
the use of restraints is not as easily
justified as some
might think. The following laws and policies apply to shackling
of youth:
INTERNATIONAL TREATIES & DECLARATIONS:
Article 34, UN Rules for the Protection of Juveniles
Deprived of their Liberty provides for the use of
mechanical restraints in "exceptional cases" alone, citing
prevention of self-injury, injury to others or serious
destruction of property as justification.
Article 37, UN Convention on the Rights of the Child
provides that no child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel,
inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment
and she or he must be treated in a manner
that takes into account
the needs of persons of her or his
age.
Article 26.4, UN Standard Minimum Rules for the
Administration of Juvenile Justice
provides that young
women in prison deserve
special attention to their personal needs and
problems and that their fair treatment shall be ensured.
CANADIAN FEDERAL LAWS
Preamble, Youth Criminal Justice Act
WHEREAS Canada is a party to the United Nations Convention
on the Rights of the Child and recognizes that young persons
have rights and freedoms, including those stated in the
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Canadian
Bill of Rights, and have special guarantees of their rights
and freedoms;
AND WHEREAS Canadian society should have a youth criminal
justice system that commands respect, takes into account the
interests of victims, fosters responsibility and ensures
accountability through meaningful consequences and effective
rehabilitation and reintegration, and that reserves its most
serious intervention for the most serious crimes and reduces
the over-reliance on incarceration for non-violent young
persons;
S. 3 (1) (c) Youth Criminal Justice Act
within the limits of fair and proportionate accountability,
the measures taken against young persons who commit offences
should:
(iv) respect gender, ethnic, cultural and linguistic
differences and respond to the needs
of aboriginal young persons and of young persons with
special requirements
S. 83 (1) Youth Criminal Justice Act
The purpose of the youth custody and supervision system is
to contribute to the protection of society by:
(a) carrying out sentences imposed by courts through the
safe, fair and humane
custody and supervision of young persons
S. 83 (2)
Youth Criminal Justice Act
In addition to the principles set out in section 3, the
following principles are to be used in achieving that
purpose:
(a) that the least restrictive measures consistent with the
protection of the public, of personnel working with young
persons and of young persons be used;
S. 12, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Everyone has the right not to be subjected to any cruel and
unusual treatment or punishment.
S.7, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Everyone has the right to life, liberty and security of the
person and the right not to be deprived thereof except in
accordance with the principles of fundamental justice.
THE USE OF MECHANICAL AND PHYSICAL
RESTRAINTS AGAINST YOUTH IN BRITISH COLUMBIA
The B.C. Ministry of Children and Family Development
Manual of Operations for Youth Custody Programs
provides for the use of mechanical restraints as a last
resort to be used for emergency purposes and during
transportation of youths. However, the manual also
specifically permits shackling of youth at risk for
self-harm (who are mostly girls), and during the Sweat Lodge
Program (mostly First Nations youth).
The use of restraints in youth secure custody centers in BC
has been reviewed more than once by the BC Ombudsman, whose
recommendations note deficiencies in facilities and staff
training, particularly in "passive restraint" techniques.
Specific Justifications for use of restraint:
Preventing self-harm: Girls in prison are
particularly prone to self-injurious behaviour. Self-harm is
a response to violence, depression, frustration and
confinement. The use of handcuffs and leg restraints as a
response to self-harm is extremely damaging to young women
who have typically experienced repeated and severe violence.
Preventing harm to others: Youth prison guards often
use this broad justification to mechanically or physically
restrain girls. This overuse is contrary to the
rehabilitative intentions of youth custody and the
YCJA (s.83(2) (a) principle of least
restrictive measures (see above).
The Sweat Lodge: The Sweat Lodge Program is a First
Nations ceremony carried out on the grounds at Burnaby Youth
Secure Custody Center (BYSCC). The BYSCC operations manual
specifically justifies the use of mechanical restraints
(shackles) during the sweat lodge program. This policy is
not legally justifiable and furthermore is clearly
discriminatory (racist) in that it is a continuation of
colonial criminalization of First Nations spiritual and
cultural practices.
In Transit: In B.C. Deputy Sheriffs are responsible
for the transportation of prisoners. United Nations and
domestic legislation permits the use of restraints in
transport due to a heightened risk of escape. It is not
clear however, what criteria the Sheriffs use in determining
the use of restraints, and what, if any, consideration is
given to distance and length of travel. Given that there are
only 3 youth secure custody centres in B.C., young women,
even those who are in custody for minor and "breach" offences (i.e., breach of probation) spend hours in transit
wearing hand cuffs and leg restraints.
In Court: The presiding judge has the ultimate
authority to determine whether or not a prisoner will enter
the courtroom in mechanical restraints, though
judges
generally defer to the sheriffs' judgment. United Nations
and domestic common-law authority prevent an accused from
entering a jury proceeding in restraints. Shackles are to be
removed in court unless there is a serious threat of
violence or escape. However, this applies to jury trials,
and there are no juries in youth court. In the North
Vancouver Provincial Court young women are regularly brought
into court in shackles.
Witnesses in court: If a young female prisoner is a
victim/witness, she may be brought into a courtroom in
shackles or, more often the case, held in the court cells in
shackles while she waits to testify. The Canadian
Criminal Code, s.486 (1.1) provides for the
protection of child witnesses in rape and sexual abuse
cases. These provisions allow for children to testify behind
screens or outside the courtroom in order to spare the young
victim from the trauma of facing the accused in court.
Incarcerated girls surely deserve protections under
s.486 CCC, rather than to be shackled in a lock up prior to
testifying against abusers.
WHAT CAN BE DONE?
Girls in custody should contact an advocate or a lawyer if
they believe that they have been unjustly restrained by
Sheriffs or Corrections Officers.
Girls may follow internal complaint procedures and/or
request a meeting with the Director of the Youth Custody
Center. It is helpful to ask for a meeting and/or make a
complaint in writing. Make sure to keep these documents and
request a written response to the complaint. Girls may ask
to have an advocate present in the meeting.
While Peace Officers are empowered under the
Canadian Criminal Code to
use force, they can be criminally charged for using
excessive force. A young woman may make a report to the
police if a corrections officer used excessive force
(assaulted) her.
The excessive or inappropriate use of handcuffs constitutes
a civil assault. Legal claims against prison guards have
been launched for breach of trust, negligence, and
violations of prisoners' constitutional rights. Excessive
use of restraints may violate Section 12 (cruel and
unusual punishment) and Section 15 (equality
provisions) of the Canadian Charter
of Rights and Freedoms.
For more information about the rights of young women in
conflict with the law, or if you believe you have been
unfairly/excessively restrained, please call Justice for
Girls
Prepared
by Justice for Girls & Sara Jeremko
|
 |